Expense ratios, diversification, and risk profiles set these mining ETFs apart—see how these factors shape their roles in a portfolio.
These two ETFs give exposure to two of the top metals on the market, but there are key differences in their levels of exposure.
From risk profiles to underlying assets, these two ETFs take sharply different paths to precious metals exposure.
The Fund seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Index. The Fund invests at least 80% of its total assets ...
GDX charges a lower expense ratio than SIL and manages over 5 times the assets under management. SIL and GDX both delivered triple-digit one-year returns, but GDX experienced a milder five-year ...
A bride-to-be is reconsidering her guest list after a startling message from her sister-in-law (SIL) suggested she might disrupt the wedding in an especially messy way—even if she is not invited. "Yes ...
SIL returned 158% in 2025 versus 15% for the S&P 500 as silver surged past $60 per ounce on structural supply deficits. Industrial demand for silver hit record levels exceeding 700M ounces driven by ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results